SupersetvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Superset | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 75 350 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +449 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 | 0 |
| Latest release | superset-helm-chart-0.22.8 · 9 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Superset scores 88/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Superset ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; Superset needs more configuration.
Superset is growing faster right now (+449 stars in 30 days).
Superset details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep Superset, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with