MetabasevsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Metabase | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 49 919 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +507 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | Clojure | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Metabase scores 83/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
Metabase is growing faster right now (+507 stars in 30 days).
Metabase details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep Metabase, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with