Uptime-Kuma-Web-APIvsWren AI OSS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | Wren AI OSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 13 in API | #4 of 15 in Business Intelligence |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 17 999 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +254 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 56 |
| Latest release | — | wren-v0.17.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | — | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Wren AI OSS scores 73/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Wren AI OSS ships more often: 56 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Wren AI OSS is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.
Wren AI OSS is growing faster right now (+254 stars in 30 days).
Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →Wren AI OSS details →
Swap a project
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with
Keep Wren AI OSS, compare it with