RedashvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Redash | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 28 850 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +41 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Redash scores 76/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Redash ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
Redash is growing faster right now (+41 stars in 30 days).
Redash details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep Redash, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with