ryotvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ryot | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 3 648 | 117 928 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +5 569 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 |
| Latest release | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 64/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 569 stars in 30 days).
ryot details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep ryot, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with