TradingAgentsvswger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | wger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 31 in Health & Fitness |
| GitHub stars | 117 877 | 7 202 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 518 | +241 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | 2.7 · 3 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 73/100 for wger, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for wger.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 518 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →wger details →