openGymvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openGym | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 17 039 | 117 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 870 | +5 518 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.4.3 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 81/100 for openGym, so it is the safer default.
openGym ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, openGym is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
openGym details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep openGym, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with