TradingAgentsvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 117 816 | 8 650 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 457 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →Workout.cool details →