SparkyFitnessvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SparkyFitness | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 6 502 | 117 967 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +391 | +5 608 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.10.0 · 29 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 66/100 for SparkyFitness, so it is the safer default.
SparkyFitness ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 608 stars in 30 days).
SparkyFitness details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep SparkyFitness, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with