ryotvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted Fitness Tracker projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ryot | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 3 650 | 8 650 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +44 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 1 |
| Latest release | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 64/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.
ryot ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; ryot needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).
ryot details →Workout.cool details →All Fitness Tracker projects →
Swap a project
Keep ryot, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with