Request TrackervsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Request Tracker | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 1 164 | 118 199 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +5 840 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 |
| Latest release | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Perl | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 65/100 for Request Tracker, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Request Tracker.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 840 stars in 30 days).
Request Tracker details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Request Tracker, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with