GLPIvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| GLPI | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in IT Management | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 6 532 | 118 199 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +5 840 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 11 |
| Latest release | 12.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 71/100 for GLPI, so it is the safer default.
GLPI ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; GLPI needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 840 stars in 30 days).
GLPI details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep GLPI, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with