TradingAgentsvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 117 997 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 638 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 638 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →Zammad details →