chatwootvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| chatwoot | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 38 538 | 118 088 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 377 | +5 729 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 11 |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 84/100 for chatwoot, so it is the safer default.
chatwoot ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; chatwoot needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 729 stars in 30 days).
chatwoot details →TradingAgents details →