JmalCloudvsjuicefs
Two self-hosted File Storage projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| JmalCloud | juicefs | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in File Storage | #1 of 15 in File Storage |
| GitHub stars | 410 | 14 582 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +120 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.16.9 · 4 Aug 2026 | v1.4.2 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Go |
Which one should you pick?
juicefs scores 73/100 against 50/100 for JmalCloud, so it is the safer default.
juicefs ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for JmalCloud.
juicefs is growing faster right now (+120 stars in 30 days).
JmalCloud details →juicefs details →All File Storage projects →
Swap a project
Keep JmalCloud, compare it with
Keep juicefs, compare it with