JmalCloudvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| JmalCloud | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in File Storage | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 410 | 114 255 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 546 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 8 |
| Latest release | v2.16.9 · 4 Aug 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 50/100 for JmalCloud, so it is the safer default.
JmalCloud ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, JmalCloud is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 546 stars in 30 days).
JmalCloud details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep JmalCloud, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with