JmalCloudvsnhost
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| JmalCloud | nhost | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in File Storage | #3 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 410 | 9 370 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +66 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 34 |
| Latest release | v2.16.9 · 4 Aug 2026 | cli@1.52.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nhost scores 67/100 against 50/100 for JmalCloud, so it is the safer default.
nhost ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for JmalCloud.
If you want the quickest setup, JmalCloud is easier to run; nhost needs more configuration.
nhost is growing faster right now (+66 stars in 30 days).
JmalCloud details →nhost details →
Swap a project
Keep JmalCloud, compare it with
Keep nhost, compare it with