juicefsvsStandard Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| juicefs | Standard Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in File Storage | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 14 585 | 6 684 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +123 | +52 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.4.2 · 22 Oct 2026 | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
juicefs scores 73/100 against 70/100 for Standard Notes, so it is the safer default.
juicefs ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Standard Notes.
If you want the quickest setup, juicefs is easier to run; Standard Notes needs more configuration.
juicefs is growing faster right now (+123 stars in 30 days).
juicefs details →Standard Notes details →