GhostHubvsKokoro FastAPI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| GhostHub | Kokoro FastAPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #66 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 5 610 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +133 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 14 |
| Latest release | v5.3.0 · 25 May 2026 | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Kokoro FastAPI scores 69/100 against 48/100 for GhostHub, so it is the safer default.
Kokoro FastAPI ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for GhostHub.
If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; GhostHub needs more configuration.
Kokoro FastAPI is growing faster right now (+133 stars in 30 days).
GhostHub details →Kokoro FastAPI details →
Swap a project
Keep GhostHub, compare it with
Keep Kokoro FastAPI, compare it with