GhostHubvsMediaMTX
Two self-hosted Media Server projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| GhostHub | MediaMTX | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #66 of 118 in Media Server | #3 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 20 537 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +301 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 18 |
| Latest release | v5.3.0 · 25 May 2026 | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 48/100 for GhostHub, so it is the safer default.
MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for GhostHub.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; GhostHub needs more configuration.
MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+301 stars in 30 days).
GhostHub details →MediaMTX details →All Media Server projects →
Swap a project
Keep GhostHub, compare it with
Keep MediaMTX, compare it with