GhostHubvslivekit
Two self-hosted Media Server projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| GhostHub | livekit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #66 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 21 897 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +822 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 19 |
| Latest release | v5.3.0 · 25 May 2026 | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
livekit scores 80/100 against 48/100 for GhostHub, so it is the safer default.
livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for GhostHub.
If you want the quickest setup, GhostHub is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
livekit is growing faster right now (+822 stars in 30 days).
GhostHub details →livekit details →All Media Server projects →
Swap a project
Keep GhostHub, compare it with
Keep livekit, compare it with