JellyfinvsKokoro FastAPI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Jellyfin | Kokoro FastAPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 58 744 | 5 607 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 301 | +132 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 14 |
| Latest release | v12.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Jellyfin scores 88/100 against 69/100 for Kokoro FastAPI, so it is the safer default.
Jellyfin ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Kokoro FastAPI.
If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; Jellyfin needs more configuration.
Jellyfin is growing faster right now (+1 301 stars in 30 days).
Jellyfin details →Kokoro FastAPI details →
Swap a project
Keep Jellyfin, compare it with
Keep Kokoro FastAPI, compare it with