uMapvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| uMap | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 1 628 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +25 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 11 |
| Latest release | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 64/100 for uMap, so it is the safer default.
uMap ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).
uMap details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep uMap, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with