Project OSRMvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Project OSRM | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 8 179 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 11 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Go |
Which one should you pick?
woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 69/100 for Project OSRM, so it is the safer default.
Project OSRM ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; Project OSRM needs more configuration.
woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).
Project OSRM details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Project OSRM, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with