OpenMapTilesvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenMapTiles | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 166 in Developer Tools | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 3 211 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +41 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.16 · 18 Dec 2025 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PLpgSQL | Go |
Which one should you pick?
woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 65/100 for OpenMapTiles, so it is the safer default.
woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenMapTiles.
woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).
OpenMapTiles details →woodpecker-ci details →