QGISvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QGIS | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Geospatial | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 14 728 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 |
| Latest release | final-4_2_3 · 28 Sept 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Go |
Which one should you pick?
QGIS scores 81/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QGIS.
QGIS details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep QGIS, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with