TradingAgentsvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 117 848 | 8 066 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 489 | +158 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 489 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →woodpecker-ci details →