langflowvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 156 085 | 117 554 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +894 | +5 195 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 86/100 for TradingAgents, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 195 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →TradingAgents details →All AI Agents projects →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with