OrcavsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Orca | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 108 446 | 117 554 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 539 | +5 195 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 86/100 for TradingAgents, so it is the safer default.
Orca ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
Orca details →TradingAgents details →All AI Agents projects →
Swap a project
Keep Orca, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with