langflowvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 156 109 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +918 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
langflow is growing faster right now (+918 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with