Technitium DNS ServervsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Technitium DNS Server | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 10 251 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +263 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 0 |
| Latest release | v15.6.2 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Technitium DNS Server scores 77/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Technitium DNS Server ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Technitium DNS Server is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.
Technitium DNS Server is growing faster right now (+263 stars in 30 days).
Technitium DNS Server details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep Technitium DNS Server, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with