AdGuard HomevsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AdGuard Home | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in DNS | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 37 823 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +764 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0-b.1 · 30 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
AdGuard Home scores 84/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
AdGuard Home ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
AdGuard Home is growing faster right now (+764 stars in 30 days).
AdGuard Home details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep AdGuard Home, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with