Pi-holevsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pi-hole | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 61 550 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +488 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+488 stars in 30 days).
Pi-hole details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with