Super ProductivityvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Super Productivity | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 34 in Task Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 23 240 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 000 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 6 |
| Latest release | v19.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Super Productivity scores 83/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Super Productivity ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Super Productivity is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Super Productivity is growing faster right now (+1 000 stars in 30 days).
Super Productivity details →Tube Archivist details →