grocyvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| grocy | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Home Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 9 625 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +100 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 6 |
| Latest release | v4.7.1 · 4 Sept 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Blade | Python |
Which one should you pick?
grocy scores 75/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for grocy.
If you want the quickest setup, grocy is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
grocy details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep grocy, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with