triggervsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trigger | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 16 647 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +248 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 49 | 6 |
| Latest release | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
trigger is growing faster right now (+248 stars in 30 days).
trigger details →Tube Archivist details →