Tube Archivistvsyuvomi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tube Archivist | yuvomi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 15 in Home Management |
| GitHub stars | 8 552 | 2 077 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +525 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 456 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.82.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
yuvomi scores 76/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
yuvomi ships more often: 456 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, yuvomi is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
yuvomi is growing faster right now (+525 stars in 30 days).
Tube Archivist details →yuvomi details →
Swap a project
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with
Keep yuvomi, compare it with