ryotvsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ryot | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 3 648 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 2 |
| Latest release | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ryot scores 63/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; ryot needs more configuration.
ryot is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).
ryot details →url-to-png details →
Swap a project
Keep ryot, compare it with
Keep url-to-png, compare it with