url-to-pngvswger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| url-to-png | wger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping | #1 of 31 in Health & Fitness |
| GitHub stars | 256 | 7 203 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +240 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 4 |
| Latest release | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 | 2.7 · 3 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
wger scores 73/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
wger ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; wger needs more configuration.
wger is growing faster right now (+240 stars in 30 days).
url-to-png details →wger details →
Swap a project
Keep url-to-png, compare it with
Keep wger, compare it with