url-to-pngvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| url-to-png | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 256 | 8 653 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +154 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
url-to-png ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).
url-to-png details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep url-to-png, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with