RustFSvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RustFS | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Storage | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 35 502 | 89 717 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 770 | +2 428 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 17 |
| Latest release | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
RustFS details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep RustFS, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with