automqvsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automq | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 10 921 | 35 499 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | +1 767 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 5 |
| Latest release | 1.7.4 · 29 Aug 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
RustFS scores 74/100 against 68/100 for automq, so it is the safer default.
automq ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 767 stars in 30 days).
automq details →RustFS details →
Swap a project
Keep automq, compare it with
Keep RustFS, compare it with