Versity S3 GatewayvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Versity S3 Gateway | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Storage | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 3 079 | 89 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 | +2 430 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.10.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 66/100 for Versity S3 Gateway, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Versity S3 Gateway.
If you want the quickest setup, Versity S3 Gateway is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 430 stars in 30 days).
Versity S3 Gateway details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep Versity S3 Gateway, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with