automqvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automq | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Message Broker | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 10 921 | 89 721 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +63 | +2 382 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 17 |
| Latest release | 1.7.4 · 29 Aug 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 68/100 for automq, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for automq.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 382 stars in 30 days).
automq details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep automq, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with