Request Trackervstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Request Tracker | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 1 164 | 24 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +787 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 |
| Latest release | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Perl | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 65/100 for Request Tracker, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Request Tracker.
temporal is growing faster right now (+787 stars in 30 days).
Request Tracker details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep Request Tracker, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with