temporalvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 24 059 | 6 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +781 | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
temporal is growing faster right now (+781 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with