QGIS Web ClientvsTrilium Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QGIS Web Client | Trilium Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 12 in Maps | #2 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 383 | 38 608 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +633 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 14 |
| Latest release | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.106.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Trilium Notes scores 83/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.
Trilium Notes ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QGIS Web Client.
If you want the quickest setup, Trilium Notes is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.
Trilium Notes is growing faster right now (+633 stars in 30 days).
QGIS Web Client details →Trilium Notes details →
Swap a project
Keep QGIS Web Client, compare it with
Keep Trilium Notes, compare it with