Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM)vsQGIS Web Client
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) | QGIS Web Client | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Navigation | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 8 179 | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 10 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | C++ | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) scores 71/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QGIS Web Client.
If you want the quickest setup, Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) details →QGIS Web Client details →
Swap a project
Keep Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM), compare it with
Keep QGIS Web Client, compare it with