Project N.O.M.A.D.vsQGIS Web Client
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Project N.O.M.A.D. | QGIS Web Client | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 42 in Knowledge Management | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 41 160 | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 946 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.35.1 · 5 Oct 2026 | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Project N.O.M.A.D. scores 85/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.
QGIS Web Client ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Project N.O.M.A.D..
If you want the quickest setup, Project N.O.M.A.D. is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.
Project N.O.M.A.D. is growing faster right now (+2 946 stars in 30 days).
Project N.O.M.A.D. details →QGIS Web Client details →
Swap a project
Keep Project N.O.M.A.D., compare it with
Keep QGIS Web Client, compare it with