QGIS Web Clientvsstable-diffusion-webui
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QGIS Web Client | stable-diffusion-webui | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 89/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 12 in Maps | #1 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 383 | 165 175 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +70 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
stable-diffusion-webui scores 89/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.
QGIS Web Client ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for stable-diffusion-webui.
If you want the quickest setup, stable-diffusion-webui is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.
stable-diffusion-webui is growing faster right now (+70 stars in 30 days).
QGIS Web Client details →stable-diffusion-webui details →
Swap a project
Keep QGIS Web Client, compare it with
Keep stable-diffusion-webui, compare it with